Question on Punctuation- Quotation Marks & Commas?
.
2011-12-26 03:03:35 UTC
Which has the correct punctuations?
1. "Yuck," she would have said in disgust.
2. "Yuck", she would have said in disgust
Three answers:
David Beierl
2011-12-26 03:16:17 UTC
In American usage #1 is correct. Punctuation goes inside the quotes even when it makes the meaning ambiguous. There is some pressure against this from people (like me) of a hackerish or nerdish persuasion.
In British usage I believe #2 is correct. Good for them!
quatt47
2011-12-26 03:54:34 UTC
To be absolutely correct you need to have punctuation both inside and outside the speech marks like:-
"Yuck!", she would have said in disgust.
or
"Yuck.", she would have said in disgust.
anonymous
2016-11-12 10:48:03 UTC
I do it if the quote isn't a sentence itself. to illustrate: the most suitable note of your question changed into "acceptable". i'm likely no longer doing it good, although. What receives truly confusing, is at the same time as the quote is an complete sentence, yet i'm purely utilising it as a clause, because then i am going to finally end up with a cumbersome searching ."; mixture. "Hmm...it sounds like you've multiple punctuation."; Yahoo! says. nicely, "It sounds like you forgot to positioned an section between the elipses and the i!", says I.
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.